Posts Tagged ‘India’

A schizophrenic India cannot advance scientifically

Posted in Blogs (Articles) on August 8th, 2020 by Rajesh Kochhar – Be the first to comment

India is subjecting itself to contrary pulls. It wants to be reckoned among powerhouses of modern science and technology. At the same time it is obsessed with its past and wishes to pit ancient India against the modern world. India’s commitment to modern science is only skin deep. The space allotted to it has been rapidly shrinking, and elements, which at one time were considered to constitute the lunatic fringe, have been brought centre stage and made the new mainstream.
Slogans such as ‘We have to defeat corona’ or ‘We have to chase corona far away’ have been coined and repeatedly mouthed as if we were a different virus challenging the supremacy of the corona. Community ringing of bells, clinging of utensils, and use of military helicopters to shower petals may appear to be a striking exercise in public relations, but it diverts attention from the real issues. The pandemic should have been used as an opportunity to discuss the sad state of government hospital system and medical education, but apparently it is more convenient to talk of inanities rather than address real problems.
On the one hand Indian government wants our medical experts to quickly develop covid vaccine. At the same time, false and exaggerated claims are being made quoting government sources. A manufacturer of popular brand of bread has added ‘Ayush Mininstry recommended immunity ingredients’ such as ginger, turmeric, clove, cinnamon, jaggery, etc., and started advertising it as immuno bread, as if eating it would be medically beneficail
Immunity is the new buzz world. By an unwarranted extrapolation, immunity boosting has been equated with cure and that too for covid. A video uploaded on 24 July or a little earlier shows the Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal endorsing a brand of papad being manufactured in his parliamentary constituency. He declares that it has been made under the Aatmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliant India) initiative and ‘will prove useful in the fight against corona virus’. A manufacturer has added ginger and turmeric to its bread and rebranded it as immuno, giving the imp
Cleverer people recognize the value of claims of scientific validation. At a press conference held on 23 June, Baba Ramdev, a television Yoga guru, and a successful businessman who is known to be close to the highest power centres, launched an Ayurvedic drug called Coronil, claiming that it had cured within a week all covid patients who took part in a trial conducted at the privately-run National Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS) in Jaipur. The Chancellor of NIMS and many members of the faculty shared the dais with the Baba. Under pressure from the government and the media Ramdev backtracked from the cure claim and declared that the Ayush Ministry had used the term Covid ‘management’ for our medicine and not Covid ‘treatment’. The clever distinction is going to be largely wasted on general public.
The Uttarakhand state Ayurveda department has clarified that it has granted license to Ramdev’s pharmacy for manufacturing an immunity booster and not a covid cure. The medicine consists of ingredients traditionally employed in flu and fever cases. Whatever immunity-related properties it may have, they can only be of a general nature and not specific to covid. The government is guilty of permitting the medicine to be given the misleading name, Coronil.
Ramdev has recently been prevented from using the name coronil, not on grounds of medical ethics as should have been the case but on infringement of trade mark. The Madras High Court judge went beyond copyright issues and declared: that Ramdev’s pharmaceutical company, Patanjali, has been “chasing further profits by exploiting the fear and panic among the general public by projecting a cure for the coronavirus, when actually their ‘Coronil Tablet’ is not a cure but rather an immunity booster for cough, cold and fever.” The court has imposed a fine of ten lakh rupees on the company, but this is unlikely to faze Ramdev or weaken his political connections.
Playing the victim card, the Baba declared that practitioners of Yoga and Ayurveda were being treated like terrorists and criminals. Throughout the world there is respect for ancient herbal healthcare tradition. Subjecting traditional cures to rigorous testing to bring them into modern medical mainstream is a greatly valued endeavour.
In 1969 China appointed Tu Youyou as the head of its anti-malarial drug project She interviewed patients, read Chinese medical classics, examined numerous Chinese herbs, and visited practitioners of traditional Chinese medicine. In 1981, she presented the findings relating to her discovery artemisinin at a meeting with the World Health Organization. By 2006, artemisinin had become the treatment of choice for malaria, and fetched her 2015 Nobel medicine Prize. Scientific mainstreaming of tradition is a slow, painstaking, altruistic, and long-drawn exercise. Objection is not to herbal cures but to the unethical ways employed to market them.
In times of crisis it is customary for many people to turn to ritual and religion for peace of mind. Many ancient mantras are being promoted as personal ‘protection chants’. For the Lok Sabha member, Pragya Thakur, covid provided an opportunity for pushing forward her political agenda. She exhorted people to recite Hanuman Chalisa five times a day from 25 July to 5 August to ‘rid the world of the coronavirus pandemic’, and to conclude the ritual by lighting lamps on August 5 and offering aarti to Lord Ram at home..
Usually when pandits prescribe time period fo ra ritual, they suggest say from a Monday to the next or from a full moon to the following new moon. An ‘English’ date entered Pragya’s prescription because the ground-breaking ceremony for the construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya was scheduled for that day. Individual prayers may have a soothing effect, but organized community ritual can only inflame political passions. Perhaps that was the idea.
Today we recognize the scientific and technological pre-eminence of the West and use it as a benchmark in various ways. It will be instructive to see how the Western mindset has evolved over the past six centuries. Long oceanic voyages as well as encounters with new peoples, new cultures, new geographies, and new ecologies taught the Europeans an important lesson: knowledge does not lie in the past but into the future; not in the church or ancient libraries, but in observation, exploration and experimentation.
The Recent India has chosen to dwell in the past and constantly dwell upon it. If India wishes to progress, it will have to largely resolve its inherent contradictions and jettison a substantial part of the past baggage it has chosen to carry. Unless India learns to value scientific methodology and becomes futuristic it cannot gain strength and command respect in the world.//

Government College University Lahore: Book Review

Posted in Blogs (Articles) on October 22nd, 2017 by Rajesh Kochhar – Be the first to comment

This is an enlarged version of the Book Review published in TheTribune(Spectrum) 22 October 2017


Khalid Aftab (2017) Against All Odds: Institute Building in the Real World (Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications)



Rajesh Kochhar

Panjab University Chandigarh

[email protected]


The author, Prof. Khalid Aftab, served as the Principal of Government College Lahore (GCL) from 1993 till 2002. Thanks to his sustained efforts, the College was made into a full-fledged Government College University Lahore (GCUL) in 2002 with him as the first Vice-Chancellor which post he held till 2011. He was thus at the helm of the institution’s affairs for close to two decades.

He has now written a personalized memoir describing how discipline was enforced against all odds, and academic standards raised. It is interesting to note that political leadership and bureaucracy who had happily been meddling in the college affairs finally became a party to efforts to try to restore it to its former glory. It of course helped that many influential people were old students of the College. The only other college in the sub-continent which has been comparable to GCL is Presidency College Kolkata which became a university in 2010. A comparative study of these two institutions would be instructive indeed.

Introduction of English education into the erstwhile Sikh kingdom was an immediate consequence of its annexation by the British in 1849. The colonial education policy in Punjab however was markedly different from that in Bengal. In Bengal and Bombay, the colonialists had the convenience of dealing with a mercantile class which they themselves had created and which was very enthusiastic about English. In contrast in Punjab the British had to come to terms with the rajas, zamindars, and raeeses who did not place high premium on western education.

Government College Lahore was formally established on 1 January 1864. Its first regular Principal was not hand-picked bureaucratically, but selected on the basis of an open newspaper advertisement in England. Gottlieb Wilhelm Leitner, who arrived in November that year, was an oriental scholar and at the time a lecturer in Arabic and Muslim Law at King’s College London.


Throughout the colonial period, GCL remained a bastion of  liberal English education. The two Punjabi science Nobel laureates, Har Gobind Khorana and Abdul Salam were former students, who were and are called Ravians after the College Magazine which in turn took its name from the river. Other prominent names among the old Ravians include  Faiz Ahmad Faiz (poet), Khushwant Singh (writer) and Dev Anand (actor).


At GCL as well as elsewhere English education scene was dominated by Hindus. I have carried out an actual head count of teaching staff at GCL during 1944-45. Of the 46  faculty members (excluding the Persian, Arabic, and Sanskrit departments), only 11 or 24% were Muslim. With the migration of non-Muslims to India in 1947, GCL (as well as other educational institutions in Pakistan Punjab) was drastically depleted, with reverse Muslim migration from India having a very small compensatory effect.


Because of the post-colonial socio-political changes it became impossible for the College to maintain its earlier elitist culture. ‘[T]he events that unfolded on the campus in the 1980s were worse than at any time in the past’. Throughout the sub-continent, college and university hostels almost invariably situated in the heart of the city  hold great attraction for anti-social elements whether they are enrolled as students or not. True to form, politically-backed lumpen elements increasingly gained ascendancy in GCL thanks to the appeasement policy adopted by the College administration. Rival student factions took control of the hostels and converted the College campus into a battleground.


In November 1993, Dr Khalid Aftab, then the head of economics department, was called by the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif for a meeting. It is not every day that a prime minister officially meets a college professor. We do not know anything about the background to the meeting but it turned out to be a watershed in the history of the college.


The meeting was held in the Governor’s house under whose administrative control the College lay.  To the College’s good luck, both the Prime Minister and Governor were old Ravians . Given the lawlessness that prevailed in the college, it is understandable that the Inspector General of Police was asked to be present. The Mayor of Lahore who was a close political associate of the Prime Minister also attended. When the Prime Minister asked Dr Aftab  to take charge of the College and stem the rot, the Principal-designate boldly pointed towards the Mayor and aid that his son was an important gang leader of the College. Very astutely, Nawaz Sharif changed the topic by drawing attention to the high quality of the prawns being served as snack, but surely the pre-prawn message was not lost on the Mayor.


The first task before the new Principal was instilling the fear of authority in the minds of students and staff. On his third day in office, the Principal was greeted by exchange of gun fire in a College hostel. The incident was not new but the official response was. The College filed a complaint with the police, expelled the gang leaders, and refused to budge notwithstanding the all-round political pressure and the threats from the expelled students’ families.   Similarly, the wife of a faculty member who served as superintendent of the girls’ hostel rudely told the Principal that since she had been appointed on directions from the Prime Minister’s wife she was not answerable to him. She was dismissed.


In a major development, GCL was given degree-awarding status in 1997. The influential Committee on Education of members of  Punjab Assembly had no objection to the move except that they wanted a bigger share in the Board of Governors of the autonomous College. Being powerful, politicians can be direct in their demands but vested interests employ devious strategies. Under its newly found autonomy, GCL set out to revise the syllabus, and brought out a book in English reading and comprehension for BA students, by ‘a foreign qualified teacher, Suraiya Shafi Mir. Authors of guide books based on old curriculum, the Urdu Bazar  publishers and book sellers, supported by a section of press launched vicious campaign against the new English curriculum. A privilege motion was tabled in the Punjab Assembly alleging that the new curriculum was anti-Islamic. The matter however  was settled in the College’s favour on the personal intervention of the Education Minister, a retired brigadier. At the end, an erstwhile objector, who ‘represented a religious group of Southern Punjab’ asked for a copy of the controversial book for use by his own children!


One of the most illustrious alumni of GCL was Abdus Salam  who was a student during 1942-1946 and then a professor during 1951-54. He went on to jointly win the 1979 Nobel physics prize. Pakistan however was most reluctant to own him because he was an Ahmadiya. An internationally appreciated initiative of Principal Aftab was to get government sanction in 1996 for a chair in Salam’s name.


Islamic Studies was a compulsory course at the undergraduate leve. GCUL’s curriculum on it was criticized in sections of the press and denounced as un-Islamic in the Friday sermon in many mosques. The situation was serious enough for ISI to depute an officer to visit the College for investigation. The new curriculum demanded extensive reading in subjects like philosophy of Islam and a few articles in English. While the students and most of the faculty were happy with the curriculum, a handful of teachers felt unequal to the task. Finally, the rabble-rouser was identified as a teacher in the College doubled as an Imam in a mosque in the walled city. The problem was solved by repatriating erring teachers back to the government education department and hiring younger teachers. It is noteworthy that serving army officers and retired army officers in administrative positions were quite supportive of the Dr Aftab’s modernizing agenda.



In 2002 the Higher Education Commission (HEC) permitted GCUL to hire foreign faculty. The experiment was considered to be a success except in cases where the foreign academics were of Pakistani origin. In the ‘peak years’ there were as many as 53 such professors, but by 2015 their number had fallen to zero.


Dr Aftab took a commendable initiative in collecting memorabilia connected with eminent people. The daughter of the celebrated Urdu writer Noon Meem Rashid presented the University with her father’s smoker’s pipe. She also presented a typewriter which had originally belonged to Saadat Hasan Manto and which he had sold to Rashid for 16 rupees.


Following a top-down approach, HEC announced financial incentives for promoting research among the faculty. Excessive pressures led to instances of plagiarism. An economics teacher had the temerity to lift passages from the Nobel laureate Amartya Sen for his paper in the College journal. He was forced to quit. In another case however the University was rendered helpless. Even though it was proven that  a PhD thesis in chemistry was based on ‘other’s data’, the University was ordered by the High Court to award the degree.


Academic administrators often find government auditors unreasonable. The audit team visiting GCUL objected to the purchase of furniture for the library on the ground that government rules forbade it. The argument that that a library would be meaningless without furniture cut no ice with the auditors who went to the extreme of suggesting that the cost be personally recovered from the Vice-Chancellor. He had to appear before the Public Accounts Committee of the Punjab Assembly for explanation. Finally, the matter was laid to rest by obtaining ex-post-facto permission from the Chief Minister. Interestingly, all the trouble could have been avoided if under-the-table payment had been made to the audit team as demanded!


A major contribution of Dr Aftab towards infrastructural development was the acquisition of a 370-acre chunk of land in the nearby Kala Shah Kaku town of Sheikhupura district. Dr Aftab’s friend from College days was now a big businessman and politically very well connected. At his daughter’s wedding, he contrived a meeting of the VC with the President and the Punjab Chief Minister which finally clinched the long pending issue. Here was an instance of high-powered networking being used for institutional purposes rather than personal gain.


No VC of a state-funded university has ever found a way of ensuring that government grants are released in time and the budget deficit is bridged as a matter of course. In 2010-11, GCUL’s total expenditure stood at 695 million rupees while the income was only 612 million rupees leaving a shortfall of 83 million. Over the years the University was able to build a reserve fund of 550 million rupees. Curiously, the administration was asked to keep the fund secret because the government finance department ‘kept sniffing for unspent grants like a hound’. Of course, the reserve fund is no more a secret!


Dr Aftab visited India in 2006 on invitation from India-based Ravians. The highpoint of his eminently successful and emotionally charged tour was his brief visit to his birthplace Muktsar where his grandfather had been a successful medical practitioner. (According to a report in The Tribune, Dr Aftab’s father, Dr Mohammad Khan, was a government veterinary doctor who anticipating the partition had already bought property in what became Pakistan.) The president of the municipal council presented Dr Aftab with a copy of his birth certificate and pointed out that even though Muktsar had produced three chief ministers, only one of its citizens had risen to the high position of a Vice- Chancellor.


Within a few years of 1947 both Pakistan and India renamed their part of Punjab as the Punjab as if theirs was the only one. It would have been better to retain the epithet East and West to underscore the fact that both are portions of a common cultural entity.


Dr Aftab closes his professional biography by quoting Iqbal: ‘The days of this Faqir have come to an end/ Another Seer may come or not.’


Dr Aftab was history’s choice for leading the Government College Lahore  and the Government College University Lahore at a critical juncture. His memoirs thus have an intrinsic value. They would also be of use to anybody interested in the post-1947 history of educational institutions not only in Pakistan but also elsewhere in the sub-continent.  /



Sky as a bridge: Transmission of Indian astronomy to China, Korea and Japan

Posted in Blogs (Articles) on April 5th, 2014 by Rajesh Kochhar – Be the first to comment

Rajesh Kochhar


(Please write to me if you want the full text.)

Ancient cultural tradition of the Indian subcontinent (India for short) is characterized by a combination of three important factors: (i) antiquity, (ii) continuity, and (iii) interaction with the outside world. I discuss how astronomical knowledge was transmitted from India to China and thence to Korea and China. I point out that not only a study of Indian inputs is essential for a proper understanding of Chinese history of science but also Chinese response can be of great help in understanding developments within India through firm chronology. FaceBook maxweb Twitter maxweb linkedin maxweb googleplus maxweb facebook facebook ChandigarhCity.Info facebook facebook